Official Course
Description: MCCCD Approval:
6-23-09 |
|||
EEG205 2009 Fall – 2009 Fall |
L+L |
2.0 Credit(s) |
3.0 Period(s) |
Applied
Evoked Potentials |
|||
Theory
and recording techniques including data analysis of electrical activity of the
nervous system as elicited by using selected physical stimuli (evoked
potentials) and concepts of signal averaging. Overview of BAER, VER, and SSEP
tests. Prerequisites: Admission to the Electroneurodiagnostics
Program. |
|||
Go to Competencies Go to Outline
MCCCD
Official Course Competencies: |
|
|
|
EEG205 2009
Fall – 2009 Fall |
Applied Evoked Potentials |
1.
|
Relate the development of the study of evoked potentials
(evoked responses, EP) from research to a clinical modality and compare EP to
clinical electroneurodiagnostic technology (EEG).
(I) |
2.
|
Describe the current uses of evoked potentials in a clinical
setting. (II) |
3.
|
Diagram the concept of signal averaging. (III) |
4.
|
Prepare a ratio problem illustrating the concept of the
signal to noise ration (S/N). (III) |
5.
|
Describe the concept of common mode rejection. (III) |
6.
|
List the parameters used in selecting the specific evoked
potential tests for diagnosis of a particular clinical problem. (IV) |
7.
|
Demonstrate the selection of recording sites appropriate for
these tests: Brain Auditory Evoked Response (BAER), Visual Evoked Response
(VER), Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP), and
Electrical Retirial Evoked Response (ERG). (V) |
8.
|
Describe the location of the neurological
"generators" of the BAER including their waveforms. (VI) |
9.
|
Describe the various stimuli used in these EP tests: BAER,
VER, and SSEP. (VII, VIII) |
10.
|
Identify commonly encountered sources of artifacts and possible
means of their rejection from data used for analysis. (IX, X) |
11.
|
List specific diseases that may be identified by these EP
tests: BAER, VER, SSEP, and ERG, and state why each test is appropriate for
that disease. (XI) |
12.
|
Review all literature provided. (XII) |
13.
|
Prepare, perform and complete BAER, VER, and SSEP tests on
a volunteer patient. (XIII) |
Go to Description Go to top of
Competencies
MCCCD
Official Course Outline: |
|
|
|
EEG205 2009
Fall – 2009 Fall |
Applied Evoked Potentials |
I. Use of evoked potentials
(evoked responses, EP) A. Comparison of clinical
EEG and EP 1. Clinical EEG - resting
status of nervous system 2. Clinical EP - dynamic
analysis of nervous system B. Development of EP as
clinical testing procedure II. Current clinical uses
of evoked potential (EP) tests A. Evaluation of sensory
function B. Evaluation of brain maturization C. Localization of brain
lesions D. Evaluation of higher
nervous functions III. Essential concepts of
EP data collection A. Signal averaging 1. Single response size 2. Control of trigger
timing 3. Selection of signal of
interest 4. Repetition of trigger
(stimulus) B. Signal to noise ratio 1. Small amplitude (nanovolt range) 2. S/N ratio a. 1:1 b. 1:10 c. 5:1 3. Selected sources of
noise a. Preamplifers
b. Atmospheric c. Muscle C. Common mode rejection 1. Recognition of wave
frequencies 2. Selection with instrumentation
IV. Parameters for EP
testing A. BAER B. VER C. SSEP V. Accurate identification
of EP recording sites A. BAER B. VER C. SSEP D. ERG VI. BAER A. Generators of signal B. Typical waveforms VII. Stimulus for EP
testing A. Modality and intensity B. Characteristics of
stimulus onset C. Stimulus influence on
size and morphology of EP 1. Intensity 2. Location 3. Quality VIII. Specific stimuli for
BAER, VER and SSEP A. BAER testing 1. Earphones 2. Clicks 3. Tone pips and bursts B. VER testing 1. Light source 2. Screens and goggles C. SSEP testing 1. Vibration 2. Electromechanical taps 3. Light electrical shock IX. Common EP artifacts A. Stimulus artifact B. 60 Hz noise C. Muscle potentials D. Eyeblink
and eye movements E. Skin potentials F. Noncerebral
potentials X. Artifact rejection A. Theory of rejection B. Alternation of stimulus
polarity C. Variation of stimulus
interval D. Prestimulus
muscle contraction E. Record and average eye
movements F. Skin preparation under
electrodes G. Patient movement XI. Relationship of
specific EP tests to specific diseases A. BAER 1. Hearing function in
infants 2. Childhood autism 3. Mutiple
sclerosis B. SSEP 1. Mutiple
sclerosis 2. Peripheral neuropathies C. VER 1. Retinal degeneration 2. Retrobulbar
neuritis 3. Multiple sclerosis D. ERG 1. Hydroencephaly
2. Lesions of primary
visual cortex 3. Loss of primary visual
cortex XII. Literature review XIII. BAER, VER, and SSEP testing
demonstrations A. Preparation of equipment
B. Explanation of procedure
to volunteer patient C. Preparation of volunteer
patient D. Conduct supervised
testing E. Clean up patient, area
and equipment after testing F. Preparation of data G. Presentation of data E. Clean up patient, area,
and equipment after testing |